Marriage & Divorce
  • Home
  • Marriage
  • Divorce
  • Books
  • Resources
    • Video Series
    • Booklets
    • Blogs
  • About
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu
Blogs
Game Theory Blogs, Separating Parents

Trick #5

The tactical domination

In prior articles, we wrote about the natural desire to prevail against perceived rivals and the potential use of game theory to understand obstacles in the current legal system as it takes families through parental separations and divorce.  We next focused on how the legal system begins to trick people into self-defeating patterns of decision making: Trick #1 – distracting people from their life goals into thinking that legal outcomes are goals; Trick #2 – treating divorce as a zero sum game; Trick #3: the system assumes disputes and seduces parents into thinking the same; Trick #4: treating children as property.

Trick #5 emanates from the very concept in the legal system that two sides of an issue are presented as well as possible to a neutral party, the judge, and the result is a fair decision.  In criminal law, the state selfishly tries to prove that the alleged criminal is at fault and should be punished while the alleged criminal tries to prove innocence.  In contract law, each side selfishly tries to prove their position is the correct one.  In injury cases, one side selfishly tries to prove liability and the other side selfishly tries to deny it.  In family law, the divorcing parties selfishly try to prove that his or her position on a legal issue is the right one.  In short, separating/divorcing parties are tricked into thinking that selfishness is the best strategy.  Given that about 90-95% of all family law cases settle without a trial, the trick compounds the problem by introducing selfishness as the best strategy for settlement negotiations.  Experience tells us that the worse divorce cases are those with pathologically selfish parties, so why have a system that promotes selfishness as a negotiating strategy?

Game Theory informs us that selfish strategies in negotiations minimize the value of the outcome for both parties.  John Nash introduced the Nash Equilibrium in Game Theory, combining a cooperative aspect to negotiations, that is, an effort to maximize the value of the outcome for both parties, before engaging in the more competitive stage involving compromise.  Business incorporated this Game Theory principle in coopetition strategies.  In our book, Game Theory and the Transformation of Family Law (Waldron & Koritzinsky, Unhooked Books, 2015), we show how these stages in negotiations can substantially improve the value of outcomes for the divorcing spouses and, when there are children, for the family.  Game Theory informs us that in fact the best strategies involve balancing self-interest (narcissism) with a sincere interest in the other party also having a positive outcome (altruism).

We have to go back to Trick #3 to understand this obstacle in family law – the assumption that divorcing spouses have a dispute.  In selfish negotiations, this assumption becomes true: the parties each take a selfish position on some legal outcome; and, because selfish positions inevitably differ, they now have a dispute.  However, if we view a divorce as a planning opportunity, not a dispute, parties can balance selfishness with altruism, grow the pie for both of them and satisfy both desires – to have the best outcome for themselves and for the other party.

Game Theory is both a branch of mathematics and a science.  It is a science because rigorous experiments have been performed to test hypotheses.  The hypothesis that a balance of narcissism and altruism produces the best outcomes for people, rather than purely selfish strategies has been tested.  The results indicate that in selfish negotiations, parties end up with some percentage of 100%.  In balanced negotiations, the parties get some percentage of up to 146%.  By focusing on achieving what is important to both of them, they can grow the pie and each have more value in the outcome.

by Kenneth Waldron
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://marriageanddivorce.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/the-tactical-domination-P2SJ4Z8.png 667 1000 Kenneth Waldron /wp-content/uploads/2023/05/logo-marriage-and-divorce-books.svg Kenneth Waldron2023-05-22 12:07:002023-05-26 15:08:09Trick #5
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • Communication in a Co-Parenting Relationship
  • Divorce Settlement
  • Divorced and/or Separated Parents Series
  • Expert Problem Solving Series
  • Game Theory Blogs
  • Getting a Perspective on Co-Parenting
  • Separating Parents
  • Skill Building Series
  • Uncategorized
  • Winning is Everything
Marriage and Divorce logo
© 2023 All rights reserved. | 1 Day Website by Bizzy Bizzy
Trick #7Face to face like wall and axeThe khaki squad attackTrick #4
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more×

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Terms and Conditions
Accept settingsHide notification only